Seniority rule at work plays a vital role in the success of the company. They will provide opportunities to become representatives or leaders for a particular group of employees. They will treat as a valuable employee. The following points help you understand how does the seniority system work. An experienced or a senior employee is a person who understands the working environment of the company better than its founder.
Therefore, a person with a seniority quota of the work in the company will deserve a better shot at the promotion. Therefore, having a senior and experienced employee in the company will beneficial for the company similarly it is beneficial for the person as well when it comes to salary packages. The seniority system brings some sort of inspirational and creative elements in the working environment of the company. It is very essential for the company that it cultivates some working culture and inspiration among the employees and the working environment of the company.
Therefore, the seniority system develops an entire working culture and environment of the company. It improves the energy and working behavior of the company. Sometimes when people receive a phrase with performance and seniority in their working culture.
It is most of the time misinterpreted in the way that performance and seniority are the same things, but it is wrong. Performance and seniority are two different things when it comes to their environmental behavior. Performance can measure in terms of their involvement in the development of the company. And Performance is something that distinguishes hard work and quantity of work assign to an employee. Seniority is something that comes with experience in such kind of work.
Therefore, it is better to understand that seniority is different from the level of performance which quantifies the successful completion of the assigned work.
Merit Pay and Seniority Pay are two different things when it comes to their nature of work. Sometimes a company can recognize the quality of the work completed by their employees and they decide to provide such employees a merit pay considering their quality and quantity of work.
It helps disguise partiality issues between employees of the company. And that can lead to less level of issues between the company. When the employee starts differentiating work to their employees considering their seniority and their merit, then all employees of the company may experience some sort of job satisfaction for the work they delivered.
Non-union employers might also use seniority as a basis for promotions and pay increases, but it's usually considered alongside other factors such as knowledge, the accomplishment of work goals, experience and cultural fit. That's because seniority, of itself, is not a measure of job performance. It's perfectly possible for someone with a year tenure in an organization to perform worse than someone who has only been there for six months. Performance can be measured by how well someone performs her job role.
It distinguishes an employee who works hard from someone who does not - and it distinguishes someone who goes the extra mile from someone who only goes through the motions. Seniority comes with experience.
It should translate to better performance, but there's no guarantee that a senior person will have more talent or drive than her junior team members. This is the main criticism of seniority — that it values longevity over merit. If an under-performing employee is promoted solely on the basis of seniority, then that company could end up paying more for an employee who is not achieving as much as a less-senior and therefore cheaper colleague.
What happens then, if salaries are awarded based on seniority - rather than on merit? This sends a message that an employee is considered worthy of compensation for the length of his service - and not for the quality of his work. To many, this feels like an unjust system — employees with seniority earn more money than other employees doing the same or better work, and the cream is not allowed to rise to the top of the corporate hierarchy. It can even signal career disaster for ambitious junior employees who want to advance their careers as quickly as possible.
These employees may see little point in over-delivering at their jobs when it's loyalty, not talent, that gets rewarded. As a result, they may choose to avoid jobs with seniority systems that might stifle their ambition.
Even in the unionized sector, critics argue that in today's knowledge economy, seniority is likely to hinder recruitment. Suppose, for instance, that a company wants to hire an electrical power-line installer, where skills are in short supply. The newcomer would be the first to be allocated shifts that did not suit him. Since he has the luxury of choosing his employer, he may decide to take his skills elsewhere. While seniority wage profiles are as steep as ever in the union sector, non-union employers place much more emphasis on occupational expertise.
A system that holds onto senior employees at the expense of talented juniors is a little unpalatable to most companies.
We live in an era of equal opportunities where everyone who performs well should be given the benefits they deserve. Plus, the nature of work is changing. Technology evolves so quickly that experience may not afford the benefits it once did. Location Cambodia. October 25, The newly expanded guide provides information on what constitutes attorney-client privilege in over 70 countries around the world.
Readers can browse the contributions, generate country-specific reports, and compare attorney-client privilege in multiple jurisdictions. For more information, please visit the Lex Mundi website. Read More. October 14, This guide outlines all of the key factors for starting and operating a business in the Thai market. The guides serve as a useful resource when planning an international business strategy or researching a new market.
September 13, Tips for Employers on Employee Vaccinations in Vietnam. Businesses in Vietnam recognize the need to vaccinate their workers in order to keep their factories and workplaces open.
In this article, we explore whether employers may require their employees to be vaccinated, as well as associated disclosure and privacy issues under Vietnamese law. With COVID cases continuing to pose a significant threat throughout Thailand, many employers have ordered their employees to work exclusively from home in order to minimize their chances of contracting the virus.
However, this luxury is not afforded to all employees—some are unable to work from home due to the nature of their work, and consequently they are placed in the precarious position of being exposed to possible infection. The WCF provides medical-related assistance and compensation to employees who directly suffer from a work-related injury or sickness subject to certain conditions. Upon receiving a claim, the SSO will investigate by collecting facts and evidence from the employer, the infected employee and his or her colleagues, and any witnesses.
An employee who needs treatment before this determination i.
0コメント